journal article: online advertising in the 2004 US election
This article claims that the Internet _does_ make a difference during elections, for young voters. But decide for yourself.
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST
VOL 49; NUMB 2 CAMPAIGN 2004
DE/CONSTRUCTING THE MEDIATED REALITIES OF PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES, POLITICAL ADVERTISING, AND SHOWCASE SENATE RACES
pp. 265-278
Political Advertising in the 2004 Election: Comparison of Traditional Television and Internet Messages
Kaid, Linda L.
Postelnicu, Monica
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST
VOL 49; NUMB 2 CAMPAIGN 2004
DE/CONSTRUCTING THE MEDIATED REALITIES OF PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES, POLITICAL ADVERTISING, AND SHOWCASE SENATE RACES
pp. 265-278
Political Advertising in the 2004 Election: Comparison of Traditional Television and Internet Messages
Kaid, Linda L.
Postelnicu, Monica
Although television advertising remained a dominant form of communication in the 2004 presidential election, the Internet reached new levels of campaign importance, providing voters with information from candidates, the media, and independent sources. Internet sites not only provided online viewing of traditional television advertising but also provided voters with the opportunity to seek out additional information about television ads viewed on the Web. Drawing on theory and research related to channel variables, this study compared the reactions of young voters who experienced candidate advertising on television or on the Web. Results indicate that the channel really does make a difference. John Kerry’s ads were more successful in raising his image and learning scores when viewed on the Web with access to additional information sources. However, television viewing reduced feelings of political cynicism and alienation for young voters.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home